Kates Playground The Bullet

Who are we kidding? Judgement

Is it a Habit?

The "Live" in March, edits the town hall and Camblanes Meynac handles some information. Indeed blithely mixing dates, disrupting the timing of the shameless deeds and transferring the responsibilities of "things" made.
This approach is redundant , is handled, it dilutes, it interferes, it demonizes, lying by omission, one walk, one attributes to himself (what belongs to Caesar), it allows itself, it will discharge denigrated, it insinuates, is forgotten, it is rejected, we take short for 'Fool .

Before going further, I invite you to soak up much of the way must be made a 'citizen consultation', to remind you with a timetable, the various events and bring you the famous paper.

First, contrary to what Mr. Trupin in the editorial: Voting
precipitate organized somehow, was suspended by the Administrative Court at the request of the Prefect of the Gironde . Here

much truth:

1) 18 (Thursday):
assistants have perhaps gathered to organize the election process, but certainly not to determine how to proceed after the banning of "citizen consultation"
- The Mayor's circular was distributed that day! !
- Nobody could therefore make an action.

2) 20 (Saturday): Warden
, informed, finds that the organization of this "citizen consultation" is not performed according to the rules. The Prefect, solely responsible for his actions, made a motion, Friday, March 19 with the Tribunal Administration.

In the text, presented in the "Live" is given great power to others. I hope that in real life, in democracy in which I believe to live, it's not possible!

However, cancellation delivered a great service for mayor. The result of this consultation was beaten irregularity, was invalid and could not serve as a reference to a council's decision.
It is surprising that the mayor does not know the general code of local government:
Is it incompetence or a deliberate act to overcome the rules?

In both cases, there is definitely something wrong!

3) 21 (Sunday):
elections are held.
It is presumptuous to claim that the municipal mismanagement is the cause of a higher participation: the conclusion is generally more or less marked here and there.

As to the astonishment of our fellow citizens, it can not be otherwise, given the staging made in the lobby of the polling station and it was inconceivable that government can waive local laws ... It seems

that when one commits a foul is must be able to bear it without passing the buck.
The pantomime was not organized very dignified. A simple ad with the display of the trial would have been enough left to recognize a mistake.

4) 22 (Monday):
It seems normal that actions conform to the rules. Finally

that mess, since the announcement of "PADD" (Project Planning and Sustainable Development) and the position taken by the council, many voices have repeatedly requested information fair, objective and contradictory, nearly a year ago!

Why the rush?
Why do so without observing the rules? For what purpose?
Who profits?

Why manipulate people and Camblanes Meynac transforming the facts?

Is this normal?

How Build A Sausage Stuffer Pvc

Ban consult

City Council Camblanes Meynac and saw fit to hold a consultation in the precipitation. Probably did it wrong without the knowledge of his own volition.
An argument directed, in favor of private interests, with a convoluted questioning to find a justification without making the long-sought truth.

Prefecture took the tribunal ... Here

Judgement in full:

Prevent Shoes From Creasing

Promises do those who receive

In the last election, Mayor after thirty years believed that the field Camblanes and Meynac it was acquired ...

is what he promised in 2008:

URBAN ENVIRONMENT

The local plan, for its moderation, preserve agricultural property, maintain public areas Green and enable our joint to keep the charm that has made a reputation.
- Planning
* Avoid dispersal areas and constructive excessive densification of certain areas
* To protect the green areas and woodlands
- Environment
* Reminder of past acquisitions

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Sustainable development will be included in all municipal actions
- Buildings
*.. . taking into account the environmental impact in communal work
- In everyday life
* Preservation of natural areas (vineyards, marshes, woodlands)
* ...

AGRICULTURE ECONOMICS &

Major farmland and vineyards

The land of marshes and 190 acres of vineyards are green lungs should be protected. They are an asset that has contributed to the reputation of our town.
* Preserving vineyards while creating as part of PLU, and in consultation with the profession, economic breathing space "necessary for the maintenance of the wineries.
Economy and commercial actions
* The economic competence with been transferred under the law of CDC, the City Council will remain vigilant in the management of this file generator employment and activity.
* Maintaining existing business and trade development of generators near the quality of life and Camblanes Meynac will be the focus of municipal actions.

These commitments are they theirs? Or just a way to solicit a few votes?
But whatever! Why do they not have these campaign promises?
Why is it, do they not?

Sanyo Pro700 Usb Drivers

April 25, 2010: an anniversary of pain and shame


next Sunday, April 25 at 10:30 am in the Church of La Crau (Var) near where the bodies are buried Justine Gressler and baby Leo, died in the crash of the helicopter Dragon2b there will be a ceremony of remembrance and contemplation.

A year after the tragedy, nothing seems to have shifted towards the investigation by the Research Section of the Air Transport Force (SR-GTA) ROISSY, nor that BEAD-air and as the saying goes, "Justice takes its course." No

aviation expertise has yet to so far been orderly, two having already been refused opposed to the family of Justin, plaintiff, and no reply had yet been given to the third request, yet embellished with a private expert report prepared by a renowned forensic expert who determines the need to conduct further investigations.

At the ceremony on 25 April, in the background, if nothing happens by then, some doubt. Doubt on the ability of our institutions to respond to legitimate questions from families of victims, and doubt about the influence might have on the course of the investigation the interests of the company Eurocopter, an EADS subsidiary already ailing in the call for tenders launched by the USA on "our" tanker competition with Boeing, and even holds a market of 3 billion dollars on the military version of the EC145, the same one that crashed April 25, 2009, but in 2006 and 2003 ..

There are three weeks to prove to the bereaved families that justice and the respect due to victims exist.

Cirrhosis Breakthrough

Citizen participation

For the Regional Election Day, on 21/03/2010, consult the citizens that wanted to hold the mayor and Camblanes Meynac , was banned by the Administrative Tribunal of Bordeaux seized by the Prefecture. The following is a small light of reason. Like what the law still applies ...
Incompetence or maneuver? After thirty years of diktat, I let you choose! Preview

mail Mayors:

PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY ORGANIZED BY THE TEXTS

Decentralization is historically a movement of democratization. The democratization effort has focused on the conditions under which elected officials were aware of their actions: in 1992 and 2002, with the law "Local democracy".
same time, democratization has continued in a less classic: he works to ensure the participation of citizens themselves to determine the local public interest.
Thus, the ATR Act ("Territorial Administration of the Republic") also called Joxe Act of 1992, appearing now in Article L.2141-1 CGCT, solemnly states: "The right of the inhabitants of the town to be informed of the affairs thereof and to be consulted on decisions affecting them, inseparable from the free administration of local authorities is an essential principle of local democracy. "
The constitutional revision of 2003 was amplified movement by placing two principles in Article 72-1 of the Constitution:

• 
  
  one hand it is expected that, under conditions fixed by the simple law, "the voters of each local authority can through the exercise of the right of petition, request the inclusion in the agenda of the deliberative assembly of the community in a matter within its jurisdiction ";
• 
  other hand, this new section provides that, in accordance with the Organic Law "draft decisions or acts within the jurisdiction of a community land may, at its option, be submitted by way of referendum, the decision of the voters of that community. "
  

Following this review, the law in 2003 and 2004, came to embody these new rights. To the point that local officials, without always challenge head on the merits of the direct involvement of citizens, wonder, legitimately, if the thrust of "participatory democracy" is not inconsistent with the exercise of their responsibility. "How to involve citizens in decisions without abdicating its responsibilities? "That is the question VFPA that sums up the dilemma.
It is possible to involve citizens without necessarily giving them the last word sovereign, elected officials have the choice between a path only advisory and route decisions. Two
"appeals to the people coexist, and should be well distinguished: the consultation (which is a popular opinion) and the referendum (decision).

1. CONSULTATION
The law of consultations with local voters is now codified since the Act of August 13, 2004 and Decree of 6 December 2005 for consultations with electors In Articles L. 1112-15 et seq General Local Authorities.

To reinforce this respect for the sovereignty of the assembly, the resolution must state explicitly that this consultation is a request for advice. The
has consultation can take place only two months after delivery to the prefect of deliberation deciding consultation.
Finally, during the period of one year after the holding of a local referendum or consultation of the electors on the initiative of a local authority, it can not hold another consultation on the same object.
In organizational terms, it should take care to five points: First
, consultations may relate only to matters within the jurisdiction of the council.

Second, only the voters can be asked to vote.

Thirdly, voters must necessarily respond Yes or No to the question of whether they approve the draft decision that the council intends to take.
Fourth, expenditures related to the organization of the consultation are a voter compulsory expenditure of the local authority which has decided.
Fifth, consultation is a real vote, calling the organization of traditional polling stations, the use of conventional electoral map, the use of voting booths, ballot envelopes and transparent.

Once the result is known, the law expressly allows the authorities decision to follow or not follow the "opinion" expressed by voters: the field of law, jurisdiction is entirely discretionary and may well confirm or invalidate the outcome of the consultation.


2. LOCAL REFERENDUM
The local referendum. The initiative for consultations with electors shall be entrusted to elected by universal suffrage, which makes sense since it should lead to a decision. They, and only them who are behind the referendum.
one hand, the deliberative assembly may submit to local referendum a "draft decision aimed at resolving a matter within the jurisdiction of this community."

As for acts which would be a referendum with two qualifications:
one hand, as in the case of consultation, the referendum shall be only on matters within the jurisdiction of the municipality.

The decision prior to the consultation, which decides to use this procedure, is taken, regardless of the initiative by the legislative body, whether it be in the cause or the body he Executive has proposed to hold this consultation: by the same debate, the Assembly must both adopt the principle of consultation, determine the manner of its organization, set the polling day and calling voters.
Notwithstanding the common law of transmission of documents, this deliberation must be forwarded by the executive in the prefect eight days of its adoption . And as for simple consultations, referendums can not indeed take place two months after transmission.
In organizational terms, an information on the subject of the referendum must be made publicly available and duration of the official campaign is limited to two weeks . Concerning the adoption of the draft submitted to referendum, Article 1112-7 clarifies SO very important. The project is adopted only if:
- it not only meets the majority of the votes cast (which is consistent with national practices referendum in France which do not require a special majority or qualified);
- but "if at least half of registered voters took part in the poll" to station forbearance that plays against the initiators of the project!

If these two conditions are met, the council no longer has to intervene: the electorate has replaced him to make the decision directly.
So:

- either it is a binding referendum, but only the elect can take the initiative of its organization;
- either it is a simple consultation which voters can certainly ask the organization, but the town is then forced either to accede to this request, or in case of consultation, follow the advice coming out of the polls. Under these conditions, these techniques "participatory" democracy appear as a tactical means to enable local officials to see the people confirm or deny the legitimacy of their own positions